2003 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1958 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Sebring (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Sebring | 1958 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | 12 M |
Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2500 mm |