2003 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 294 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Sebring | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Sebring | Ram |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3020 mm |