2003 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Matra-Simca M72 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP) has 150 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Chrysler Sebring | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Sebring | M72 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 50 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
