2003 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2010 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2010 GMC Acadia is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Acadia weights approximately 762 kg more than 2003 Chrysler Sebring.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 GMC Acadia has automatic transmission and 2003 Chrysler Sebring has manual transmission. 2003 Chrysler Sebring will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 GMC Acadia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Chrysler Sebring | 2010 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Chrysler | GMC |
Model | Sebring | Acadia |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5098 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1986 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3020 mm |