2003 Citroen C 15 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS
To start off, 2003 Citroen C 15 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSS would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C 15. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS weights approximately 960 kg more than 2003 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSS (270 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C 15. (111 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C 15 | 2000 Mitsubishi SSS | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | C 15 | SSS |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 71 L |