2003 Citroen C vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C would be higher. At 1,124 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Citroen C (58 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C weights approximately 336 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen C (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Citroen C | 2009 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Citroen | Tata |
| Model | C | Nano |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 37 L |
