2003 Citroen C2 vs. 1959 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Citroen C2 (72 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (180 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 1959 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | C2 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 3153 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 1350 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2060 mm |