2003 Citroen C2 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Citroen C2 (72 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 144 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | C2 | EJ |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2680 mm |