2003 Citroen C2 vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Citroen C2 (72 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Seat 1500 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2.
Because 1963 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Citroen | Seat |
Model | C2 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 71 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2660 mm |