2003 Citroen C2 vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Citroen C2 (72 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C2 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen C2 (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Citroen | MG |
Model | C2 | 1100 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2380 mm |