2003 Citroen C2 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,124 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Citroen C2 (58 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C2 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Citroen C2 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Citroen | DAF |
| Model | C2 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 33 L |
