2003 Citroen C2 vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Belmont (76 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (163 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | C2 | Belmont |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2130 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 76 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2830 mm |