2003 Citroen C2 vs. 1970 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 310 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (326 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 1970 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C2 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2003 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1628 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 326 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2830 mm |