2003 Citroen C2 vs. 1996 Renault 19
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault 19 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault 19 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault 19 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault 19 weights approximately 150 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 150 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 1996 Renault 19 | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | C2 | 19 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 55 L |