2003 Citroen C2 vs. 2005 GMC Savana
To start off, 2005 GMC Savana is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Savana (195 HP) has 137 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (58 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Savana weights approximately 1394 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Savana (353 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (110 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 2005 GMC Savana | |
Make | Citroen | GMC |
Model | C2 | Savana |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 117 L |