2003 Citroen C2 vs. 2006 Fiat Palio II
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 1,358 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 72 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen C2 (120 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (103 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 2006 Fiat Palio II | |
Make | Citroen | Fiat |
Model | C2 | Palio II |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 70.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 78.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 54 L |