2003 Citroen C2 vs. 2008 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (257 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (58 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 3 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 2008 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | 3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2261 cc |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 94 mm |
Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.4 seconds | 6.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 55 L |