2003 Citroen C2 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP) has 135 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C2 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C2 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 74 L |