2003 Citroen C3 vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2003 Citroen C3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C3 weights approximately 522 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen C3 (120 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C3 | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Citroen | Seat |
Model | C3 | 600 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1097 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2010 mm |