2003 Citroen C3 vs. 1968 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2003 Citroen C3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1968 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C3 weights approximately 169 kg more than 1968 NSU Ro 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C3. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C3 | 1968 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Citroen | NSU |
Model | C3 | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1379 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 37 L |