2003 Citroen C3 vs. 1992 Mazda 626

To start off, 2003 Citroen C3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C3 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (172 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C3. (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Citroen C3 1992 Mazda 626
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C3 626
Year Released 2003 1992
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1628 cc 1990 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 143 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.5 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1175 kg 1155 kg
Vehicle Length 3940 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2620 mm