2003 Citroen C3 vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 111 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda MPV weights approximately 526 kg more than 2003 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C3. (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C3 | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C3 | MPV |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 200 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |