2003 Citroen C3 vs. 2008 Daewoo Kalos
To start off, 2008 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Daewoo Kalos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Daewoo Kalos (82 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Kalos should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C3 weights approximately 27 kg more than 2008 Daewoo Kalos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Daewoo Kalos (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C3. (120 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2008 Daewoo Kalos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C3 | 2008 Daewoo Kalos | |
Make | Citroen | Daewoo |
Model | C3 | Kalos |
Year Released | 2003 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.4 seconds | 12.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1097 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |