2003 Citroen C3 vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C3 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen C3 (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (135 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Citroen C3 2009 Mazda 3
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C3 3
Year Released 2003 2009
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1628 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 106 HP 146 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 143 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1175 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Length 3940 mm 4600 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 50 L