2003 Citroen C3 vs. 2012 BMW 120
To start off, 2012 BMW 120 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 BMW 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 120 (170 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 120 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 120 weights approximately 408 kg more than 2003 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 BMW 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 120 (190 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C3. (120 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C3 | 2012 BMW 120 | |
Make | Citroen | BMW |
Model | C3 | 120 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1097 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1411 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 51 L |