2003 Citroen C3 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (253 HP) has 145 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (288 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C3. (111 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C3 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Citroen | Chevrolet |
Model | C3 | Captiva |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 253 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 288 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 65 L |