2003 Citroen C3 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 876 kg more than 2003 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C3. (111 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C3. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 2003 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2003 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Citroen C3 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Citroen | Dodge |
| Model | C3 | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 365 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 536 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1053 kg | 1929 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3052 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |
