2003 Citroen C5 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2003 Citroen C5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,749 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C5. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C5 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C5. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen C5 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C5 | Puma |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1749 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 42 L |