2003 Citroen Xsara vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2003 Citroen Xsara is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Citroen Xsara (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 218 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen Xsara | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Citroen | Maserati |
Model | Xsara | A6G |
Year Released | 2003 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2560 mm |