2003 Citroen Xsara vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 2003 Citroen Xsara is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Citroen Xsara (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 668 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen Xsara | 1966 Renault 4 | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Xsara | 4 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |