2003 Citroen Xsara vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2003 Citroen Xsara is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Citroen Xsara. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 304 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen Xsara (136 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen Xsara | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1527 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1246 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2210 mm |