2003 Citroen Xsara vs. 1976 Mazda 616
To start off, 2003 Citroen Xsara is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Citroen Xsara (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 336 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen Xsara (136 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen Xsara | 1976 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | 616 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1527 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1246 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |