2003 Citroen Xsara vs. 1976 Mazda 818

To start off, 2003 Citroen Xsara is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda 818 (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Citroen Xsara. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda 818 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 218 kg more than 1976 Mazda 818.

Because 1976 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen Xsara (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 818.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Citroen Xsara 1976 Mazda 818
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara 818
Year Released 2003 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1360 cc 1272 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 68 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 160 Nm 92 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1220 kg 1002 kg
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 4100 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2320 mm