2003 Citroen Xsara vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2003 Citroen Xsara is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 360 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 360 (101 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2003 Citroen Xsara. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 360 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 170 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 360 (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen Xsara. (161 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 360 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen Xsara | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Xsara | 360 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |