2003 Citroen Xsara vs. 1996 Lada 110
To start off, 2003 Citroen Xsara is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada 110 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lada 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lada 110 (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2003 Citroen Xsara. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen Xsara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen Xsara (161 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Citroen Xsara | 1996 Lada 110 | |
Make | Citroen | Lada |
Model | Xsara | 110 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 71 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2500 mm |