2003 Citroen Xsara vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2003 Citroen Xsara. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 145 kg more than 2012 Mazda BT-50.

Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen Xsara. (161 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Citroen Xsara 2012 Mazda BT-50
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara BT-50
Year Released 2003 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1398 cc 2604 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 67 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 161 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 73.7 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 98 mm
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1270 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 3010 mm