2003 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lotus 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Lanos. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 554 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 1963 Lotus 25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus 25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daewoo Lanos | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
Make | Daewoo | Lotus |
Model | Lanos | 25 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1349 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 9500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 456 kg |