2003 Daewoo Magnus vs. 1969 Lotus Elan

To start off, 2003 Daewoo Magnus is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Daewoo Magnus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daewoo Magnus (129 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1969 Lotus Elan. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Magnus should accelerate faster than 1969 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Daewoo Magnus weights approximately 661 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Magnus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Daewoo Magnus (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Daewoo Magnus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Daewoo Magnus 1969 Lotus Elan
Make Daewoo Lotus
Model Magnus Elan
Year Released 2003 1969
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1558 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 181 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.1 mm 82.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 72.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1550 kg 889 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1200 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2440 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 59 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]