2003 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Holden EK (64 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Daewoo Matiz | 1962 Holden EK | |
| Make | Daewoo | Holden |
| Model | Matiz | EK |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
