2003 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 796 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 Daewoo Matiz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 398 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Daewoo Matiz (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Daewoo Matiz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daewoo Matiz | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Matiz | R 360 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 778 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 1770 mm |