2003 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Cortina (90 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm). This means 1963 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daewoo Matiz | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Matiz | Cortina |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 69 Nm | 90 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2500 mm |