2003 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1966 Saab 96

To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Saab 96. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Saab 96 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Saab 96 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 63 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Saab 96 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Saab 96 (115 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1966 Saab 96 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Daewoo Matiz 1966 Saab 96
Make Daewoo Saab
Model Matiz 96
Year Released 2003 1966
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 994 cc 1498 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 63 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 4700 RPM
Torque 87 Nm 115 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 68.5 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 67.5 mm 58.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 9.0:1
Top Speed 152 km/hour 145 km/hour
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 825 kg 930 kg
Vehicle Length 3500 mm 4310 mm
Vehicle Width 1500 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2350 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 38 L 38 L