2003 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1977 Rover 2600
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rover 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rover 2600 would be higher. At 2,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Rover 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Rover 2600 (136 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Rover 2600 should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Rover 2600 weights approximately 523 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Rover 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Rover 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Rover 2600 (206 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1977 Rover 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. 1977 Rover 2600 has automatic transmission and 2003 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2003 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Rover 2600 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daewoo Matiz | 1977 Rover 2600 | |
Make | Daewoo | Rover |
Model | Matiz | 2600 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 994 cc | 2596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1348 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 65 L |