2003 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1985 Mazda 323
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Mazda 323 (72 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mazda 323 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Mazda 323 (111 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1985 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daewoo Matiz | 1985 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Matiz | 323 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 994 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1640 mm |