2003 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1203 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Tundra (430 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daewoo Matiz | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Daewoo | Toyota |
Model | Matiz | Tundra |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 994 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 430 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 100 L |