2003 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2006 Mazda 6

To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 15 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Daewoo Matiz 2006 Mazda 6
Make Daewoo Mazda
Model Matiz 6
Year Released 2003 2006
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 994 cc 2964 cc
Horse Power 63 HP 215 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 87 Nm 270 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 5000 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 825 kg 810 kg
Vehicle Length 3500 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1500 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2350 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Consumption 5.3 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 8.2 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.4 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 38 L 68 L