2003 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2009 Ford Ka

To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ka weights approximately 109 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Daewoo Matiz 2009 Ford Ka
Make Daewoo Ford
Model Matiz Ka
Year Released 2003 2009
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 796 cc 1297 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 51 HP 68 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 69 Nm 106 Nm
Torque RPM 4600 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 778 kg 887 kg
Vehicle Length 3500 mm 3630 mm
Vehicle Width 1500 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2350 mm 2450 mm