2003 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (464 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 401 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 1104 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (637 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 550 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 2003 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2003 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daewoo Matiz | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Daewoo | Dodge |
Model | Matiz | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 994 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 464 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 637 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.3 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.2 L/100km | 15 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 72 L |