2003 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 250 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. (107 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Daewoo Rezzo | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Daewoo | Holden |
| Model | Rezzo | UTE |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 107 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
