2003 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. (107 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 90 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-7.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. 2009 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 2003 Daewoo Rezzo has manual transmission. 2003 Daewoo Rezzo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Daewoo Rezzo | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Rezzo | CX-7 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 69 L |